WHY HITLER HATED THE JEWS

THE HOLOCAUST

The Holocaust was Nazi Germany’s premediated, or structured, state-sponsored subjection and mechanistic murder of neary six million European Jews and at least five million prisoners of war, homosexuals, and other victims. Holocaust is a word of Greek origin. It means “burnt offering.”

prisoners in a concentration camp.

After the death of German president Paul von Hindenburg in 1938, Hitler the then German chancellor assumed power as an absolute ruler by uniting the chancellorship and the presidency. Hitler began an orderly movement to confiscate Jews properties, their jobs in civil service, military, academia and the judiciary were given to non-Jews. Synagogues were degraded and scorched. Jewish businesses were disregarded or abandoned. Laws were passed which prohibited Jews from marrying non-Jews, their citizenship striped off and were denied their political rights.

Hitler hatred for the Jews can be traced back in viena. As a young man he aspired to be a painter, he even applied for admission in the academy of arts but his drawing was so lowly regarded that he was not allowed to take the test. He was convinced that failure in painting was only due to the fact that trade in works of art was in Jewish hands.” One can only guess at the “personal thing” which Hitler claimed motivated his hatred of all things Jewish: perhaps an art dealer or pawnshop operator; perhaps an official at the Academy of Art; perhaps some combination of these things; or even something which lay dormant in the recesses of his mind.

Two of Hitler’s closest friends at the Mannerheim were Jewish—a one-eyed locksmith named Robinson who often helped him and a part-time Hungarian art dealer, Josef Neumann, who took pity on Adolf’s tattered attire and gave him a long frock coat. Hitler “highly esteemed” the latter and once remarked that he was “a very decent man.” He also expressed great regard for the three Jewish art dealers who bought most of his work, and more than once told, his agent, that he preferred doing business with Jews “because only they were willing to take chances.” Hitler himself claimed in Mein Kompf that he had become a dedicated anti-Semite in Vienna upon his discovery that the Jew was the “coldhearted, shameless, and calculating director” of prostitution; that the music and art worlds were controlled by Jews; and, most important, that the Social Democrat press was “directed predominantly by Jews.” More likely these revelations came much later and his prejudice was little more than that of the average Viennese. Almost every gentile in the Austrian capital was an anti-Semite. Organized groups worked tirelessly to spread hate against Jews and young Hitler became an avid reader of the trash literature which filled the newsstands. There is evidence that he was a regular reader of such magazines as Ostara, the creation of Lanz von Liebenfels, a mystical theorist who shared many of Hitler’s own theories and attitudes. The magazine itself was a concoction of the occult and erotic, its editorial policy “the practical application of anthropological research for the purpose of … preserving the European master race from destruction by the maintenance of racial purity.” Liebenfels’ recurring theme was that Aryans must rule the earth by destroying their dark, racially mixed enemies. The latter were damned as inferiors and yet the pages of Ostara abounded in lurid illustrations of Aryan women succumbing to the sexual power and allure of these hairy, apelike creatures. The magazine appealed simultaneously to superiority and fear, featuring such headlines as: ARE YOU BLOND? THEN YOU ARE A CULTURE-CREATOR AND A CULTURE-SUPPORTER! ARE YOU BLOND? IF SO, DANGERS THREATEN

Hitler brother had died of measles and his mother had died of breast cancer. Both were being treated by Jewish physicians. Although Hitler thanked Dr blotch who was treating his mother, this could have also led to his hatred for the Jews. Dr blotch was treating his mother with iodoform which was a very agonizing procedure. Gauze was saturated with iodoform (which had a nauseating, clinging, “hospital” odor) and then folded around the open wound. Not only did the iodoform burn its way into the tissues but once it entered the system the patient could not swallow. Klara’s throat burned and yet she could not quench this burning thirst since all liquids tasted like poison. During this seminal period in Vienna, Hitler wrote a letter to a friend, revealing not only the possible physical effects of such a submerged obsession (“I often grew sick to my stomach from the smell of those caftan-wearers”) but a disgust with doctors and a feeling of his own destiny. …It was probably no more than a little stomach colic and I am trying now to cure myself by a diet (fruit and vegetables) since all the physicians are idiots anyway. I find it absolutely ridiculous to speak of a nervous ailment in my case when I am the healthiest of man otherwise. This shows how hitler disregarded Jewish doctors.

It is impossible to know how deep Adolf Hitler’s fear and hatred of Jews ran on the day he was gassed in Belgium. Within a year, however, hatred of all things Jewish would become an overt and dominant force in his life. Hitler was only one among millions of other patriots who learned to fear Jews and Reds (almost as a single entity) during this period. For in these months the country was engulfed by a terrifying series of Marxist-inspired uprisings that threatened to destroy the fabric of German existence. Significantly, the revolutions began while Hitler was suffering the depressing after effects of mustard gas

After two months he was released from the hospital and transferred to a replacement battalion in Munich. He himself forbade publication of what became known as Hitler’s Secret Book and appeared for the first time thirty-two years later. Perhaps he feared it was too philosophically heavy for his adherents, too flimsily transparent for the more sophisticated; perhaps he did not want to reveal the ultimate mass-murder plan that hid behind its terminology. Within the pages also lay clues to his motivation for genocide. They were replete with revealing references: the Jew was a “master of international poisoning and race corruption,” as well as the instigator of the “evil pacifist liquid manure [which] poisons the mentality favoring bold self-preservation.” He referred to the flood of “disease bacilli” now breeding in Russia; and called the crowded working-class districts of Germany (the result of inadequate Lebensraum) “abscesses in the national body” as well as “breeding grounds of blood mixing and bastardization, and of race lowering, thus resulting in those purulent infection centers in which the international Jewish racial-maggots thrive and finally effect further destruction.” This obsession with Jewish poisoning and corruption twice took on a startling personal nature in the book. He referred to the hated Erzberger, who signed the 1918 armistice, as “the bastard son of a servant-girl and a Jewish employer.”

His simmering hatred of Jews had been activated by what he himself had witnessed on the streets of Munich. Everywhere Jews in power: first Eisner, then anarchists like Toller, and finally Russian Reds like Leviné. In Berlin it had been Rosa Luxemburg; in Budapest Béla Kun, in Moscow Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev. The conspiracy Hitler had previously suspected was turning into reality. Before embarking on their duties, he and his fellow political agent.

In the German army desertions multiplied. Everywhere there was talk of mutiny and revolt, and when the British launched a surprise attack near Amiens in early August the German lines caved in practically without resistance. The Kaiser’s men surrendered in masse at times to a single enemy infantryman. Retreating men shouted to reinforcements coming up to the front, “Strikebreakers!” Yet it was not the end. The Germans retreated but the line held. For every defeatist there still were hundreds of soldiers ready to do their duty. But at home faith was fading. There were numerous strikes and everywhere in the cities radical socialists were talking revolution. To stout spirits like Hitler the secure and unmolested home front, its laggards, its profiteers, its malingerers, its traitors, its Jews who had no love or respect for the German Fatherland, had betrayed the fighting front in its gravest hour. In fact, it was Ludendorff who lost his nerve and pressed the civilian government for an armistice. Even at this late hour, the ardent spirits like Hitler were convinced that some solution, if not victory, was possible so long as resistance continued. The front had not broken and was retreating in an orderly fashion. It was these profiteers, these malingerers, these Jews who would bring defeat from within.

Sight also brought Hitler hope and renewed interest in the events of the day. Berlin itself was in a state of virtual siege as the new Chancellor urged the Kaiser to abdicate so that an armistice could be signed. Hitler had heard stories of rebellion throughout Germany but discounted them as rumor until a delegation of Red German sailors burst into his ward early that November in an attempt to convert the patients to the revolution. Hitler’s detestation of Bolshevism was heightened by the fact that three of the leaders were young Jews, none of whom, he was sure, had been at the front. “Now they raised the red rag in the homeland.” Indignation was followed by shock. Hitler took to his bed. “I lay there broken with great pains, although I did not let on how I felt; for it was repugnant to me to cry out at a time when you could feel that the collapse was coming.” A little later, on November 9, a dignified elderly pastor arrived at Pasewalk hospital to confirm news of the uprisings. Revolution had even broken out in Munich.

Hitler used the Jews to gain political mileage. As stated in his book, we cannot bargain with the Jews, only present them with a hard ‘either-or.’ But I was now resolved to become a politician.” And in his role as politician it would be his mission to solve the Jewish question with radically harsh methods—and in the name of God. “Therefore, I am now convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator by fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord’s work.” To the growing army of racists in Germany, the pages of Mein Kampf were an inspiration and their author the personification of their struggle against all enemies at home and of Prometheus and Lucifer. Hitler believed that the Jews had occupied Germans living space. He believed that Germany had been robbed of her power factors by three abominations: internationalism, democracy and pacifism. Hitler then linked this evil trinity with racism. According to hitler the Jews were the creators of democracy, pacifism and the interactionism.

 By the end of the summer of 1928 Hitler had finally come to the realization that his two most urgent convictions—danger from Jews and Germany’s need for sufficient living space—were entwined. If the Reich failed to acquire essential living space it would perish. If the Jewish menace were not stemmed there could be no struggle for Lebensraum, no culture, and the nation would decay. This, in all likelihood, marked Hitler’s point of no return and was the essence of his Weltanschauung. Now a dual task lay before him: to conquer new living space in the East and to annihilate the Jews. What had seemed to be two separate if parallel courses were a single road. It was as if for months he had been observing the twin mountain peaks from his villa on the Obersalzberg, both of which he wanted to climb— and only now realized that the same trail led to both. He had seen the light. Martin Luther and all the other anti-Semites before Hitler merely talked of eliminating the Jews but with his new blueprint for the future he hoped to materialize their dream—and become Haman II.

Hitler’s loath for the Jews led to cataclysmic corollaries. His slanted world view and   chauvinism flagged the way for the Holocaust, a gruesome event that caused the lives of 6 million Jews during World War II. The Holocaust has left an ineffaceable mark on human history and powered an ongoing search for identification of the ancestries of such hatred.

adolf hitler.

GIFTS BETWEEN COUNTRIES

Gifts are normally seen as a sign of friendship between people. What about between nations/countries? Throughout history and even in modern times countries often gives each other presents. For example the amber room a gift from Prussian king Fredrick 1 to peter the great of Russia or the trojan horse to the trojans by the Greeks.

Gifts between countries might symbolize friendship , diplomatic relationships/ties or diplomatic efforts.

Here are the most bizarre gifts that countries have given to each other.

THE STATUE OF LIBERTY

It’s the most illustrious gift that a country has ever offered to another country. Initially it was copper colored then oxidized in to greenish blue. The statue was gifted to America by the French people in 1886 as a symbol of libertas a Roman goddess of liberty.It was to commemorate the alliance between the French and the united states people during the American revolution of between 1765 and 1791.It served as a symbol of heath American revolutionary war that inspired the French revolution.

There is also a small version of the statue of liberty in French capital, Paris. It’s a replica of the statue given by the American community to commemorate, (100) years of the French revolution in 1899.

THE STATUE OF LIBERTY

THE ZARAFA(GIRRAFE)

It was a gift inform of a giraffe to the French king Charles from Egyptian king ottoman viceroy in 1826.The gift was meant to persuade the french to halt supporting the Greek in the war of independence.it was ostensibly the first giraffe to be seen in Europe for over three centuries.

In 2013 Mali gave a camel to France as thankyou for their liberation in 1972.

THE “PANDA” DIPLOMACY

Between 1972 and 1975 china gave out 29 pandas to 9 different countries. The most famous one was the two giant pandas (ling-ling and hsing-hsing) that they gave to then American president Richard Nixon. The two giant pandas were meant to create an efficient relationship between the two countries following the internal conflict with the republic of Taiwan.

Between 2007 and 2011 china built costa Rica a soccer stadium, in exchange costa Rica cancelled its diplomatic ties with Taiwan and signed a trade agreement with china. Estadio nacional has a sitting capacity of almost 36000 people. It cost Chinese government around 33 million dollars.

 THE RESOLUTE DESK/HAYES DESK

Given by queen Victoria to president Hayes of America in 1880.The desk was created using wood from a British ship (the himer resolute) that got stuck on the ice but later on was found and repaired.

By this time there were tensed relationship between Britain and united states. After 20 years the ship was decommissioned and the desk was made from its parts. It remains to be used as presidential desk to date.

In 2009 golden brown gifted the then u.s president barrack Obama a pen holder made of the sister ship to the himer resolute.

THE RESOLUTE DESK

THE SWORD OF STALINGRAD

Presented to field marshal Josef Stalin as a gift to the Russian people by British prime minister Winston Churchill in 1943 at a ceremony in Tehran conference. It’s a double-edged sword, four feet long with a solid silver cross guard. It was a symbol of appreciation to the soviet soldiers who had fought during the battle of Stalingrad in world war 2.

 THE TWENTY THOUSAND TULIPS

Every year the Dutch loyal family sends twenty thousand tulips to the Canadian people as a thank you for providing asylum to princess Julia and her daughter during world warii.It started in 1945 with an initial gift of 100,000 tulips. So far 830,000 tulips have been given.

Norway gifts a charismas tree to Britain every year as a sign of gratitude for British support in world war II.

THE RESET BUTTON

On 6^th, march 2009 in Geneva the then united states secretary of state Hillary Clinton presented Russia foreign minister Sergey lavlov with a red button with English word “reset”. The gift was meant to ignite the diplomatic relationship between the two countries.

Before the reset Russia U.S.A ties had been hurt by the 2008 russo-georgia diplomatic crisis in Ossetia leading to immediate response by bush

THE SENATE GRAVEL

The u.s.a senate had used the same gravel for over 200 years. The gravel is used to bring order in the senate when things become unruly. It was during a time like this that the then vice president of America Richard Nixon broke it. In 1992 the then vice president of india K.R Narayan presented the assembly with a replacement ivory gravel that looked nearly identical to the original.

other gifts include the whale tooth(tabua) by the people of Fiji to United Kingdom, M.t  Kilimanjaro by queen Victoria to Kaiser Wilhelm 11 of Prussia as a birthday gift.

COCA COLA

It is one of the most iconic brands in the world, established in 1886 in Atlanta Georgia in u.s.a . it’s the second most recognized brand behind Nike.

Initially, it was sold for medicinal purposes and was even sold in pharmacies. By then it was known as

French wine coco. it was believed to treat ailments such as headaches,  indigestion, depression, and anxiety. It will later change its name to Coca-kola and then to Coca-Cola, by this time it was not sold for medicinal purposes but as a soft drink simply because they wanted to reach more people.

Cocacola ingredient remains to be the most kept industrial secret although they are believed to be sugar, lemon, orange, coriander extracts, citric acid, cinnamon, caffeine, and extracts of coca plant leaves which are used to make cocaine.

Mexico, America, Canada, India, and China are believed to be the greatest consumer of Coca-Coca-Cola. In Mexico, one person can take745 bottles of Coca-Cola in a year with America 445 per annum, Canada, 260 bottles, and India and China 12 to 38 bottles per year. In Africa, Nigeria is the greatest Coca-Cola consumer followed by South Africa.

It’s sold to all other countries of the world except for Cuba and North Korea. This is due to trade sanctions and ideological differences between America and the two countries.

Only one country in the world where Coca-Cola can be rivaled by any other soft drink, in Scotland

With over 3500 different drinks, it will take nine years (9) for one to try or taste every drink under the Coca-Cola name.

The company is worth 75 billion with each day selling two (2) billion bottles each.

Did People HAD to Die for the Government to Withdraw the Finance Bill?

The recent passage of the finance bill in Kenya has been a deeply controversial and tragic affair, raising critical questions about governance, public participation, and the value of human life in the face of political decisions. Were unrest and death necessary catalysts for the government’s eventual decision to withdraw the finance bill?”

Public participation: JUST A FORMALITY

Public participation is a cornerstone of democratic governance, enshrined in our constitution. It ensures that citizens have a voice in the legislative process, particularly in matters that directly impact their lives. In the case of the finance bill, public participation was one of the critical stages before its presentation to parliament. However, despite significant public opposition, the government representatives appeared to dismiss these concerns, with some exhibiting arrogance rather than empathy. The dismissive attitude of government representatives during the public participation phase suggests that this process may have been treated more as a formality than a genuine attempt to engage with the populace. The public’s distrust in their representatives grew, leading to the decision to protest outside parliament on June 26th, hoping to prevent the bill’s passage.

As frustration mounted, the protests turned violent. Demonstrators breached parliament, and tragically, some lost their lives. Others were abducted or arrested in the chaos. It was only after these deaths that the President decided to withdraw the bill. This sequence of events raises a profoundly disturbing question: Did people have to die for the government to reconsider its stance?

What was so important in the finance bill that it warranted such a heavy toll on human life? The bill included measures like new taxes, increased VAT, higher fuel taxes, and taxes on digital transactions—policies that many believed would exacerbate the financial burden on already struggling citizens. While the government might have argued these measures were necessary for economic stability and development, the public saw them as unjust and harmful The deaths during the protests highlight a severe disconnect between the government and its people. The tragedy suggests that the government might have underestimated the public’s grievances or chose to ignore them entirely. This raises further questions about whether the government truly understands the needs and desires of its citizens, or if it prioritizes its agenda over the well-being of the people it serves.

The DISCONNECT.

Democracy is the government of the people, by the people, meaning that power belongs to the people. However, in Kenya, there has been a concerning shift where the government is making decisions and implementing policies without the consent of its citizens. The voices of Kenyans are being ignored, and their needs and wants are being disregarded. Despite widespread opposition, the government continues to push through measures that many believe will exacerbate their economic hardships. This disregard for public opinion has left many feeling unheard and marginalized, prompting protests and civil unrest as citizens strive to reclaim their right to be heard and have their concerns addressed.

Who Do the MPs Serve?

Today, citizens of Kenya will again be in major towns to protest under the banners #OccupyParliament and #RejectNotAmend. This follows a series of events that have left many Kenyans feeling unheard and disregarded by their elected representatives. Despite widespread opposition, the controversial financial bill was tabled for its first reading and passed, prompting a crucial question: Who do MPs represent if not their people? Many Kenyans view the proposed measures as punitive, fearing they will exacerbate the economic hardships already imposed by the 2023 financial budget. Despite citizens reaching out to MPs through texts, calls, and protests, their cries went unheeded, leading to the bill’s advancement without substantial amendments. As frustrations mount, public protests continue in major towns like Nairobi and Mombasa, reflecting a nation at odds with its legislative body. Some MPs themselves argue that they owe their positions more to their political parties and leaders than to their constituents, raising a fundamental question: Do Kenyans elect people or political parties?

Where Is the Money?

Kenyans are increasingly asking, “Where is the money?” They argue that despite paying taxes, they see no major developments in their country. Many are comparing the current government with previous regimes, noting that the latter had achieved significant progress within two years. In contrast, the current regime, now in power for the same duration, has failed to showcase any substantial developments. This lack of visible progress is fueling public frustration and leading many to question the effective use of public funds. Kenyans are asking, “If we can’t see what you’ve done with what you’ve collected, why should we pay more taxes?”

Is Kenya’s Debt a Threat?

Politicians affiliated with the government usually say that a significant portion of the money collected is going towards debt repayment. Are those just gimmicks and rhetoric? Rumors abound regarding Kenya’s financial state, and questions arise about whether the President follows through on his fiscal promises. Reports suggest State House plans to spend 1 billion on furniture, and concerns linger about the inadequate answers regarding the alleged 200 million private jet to the U.S. Why does a country in debt allocate funds for the President and Deputy President’s spouses? Furthermore, why do government-affiliated politicians live luxuriously with choppers, expensive clothing, and watches? And where do the millions for weekend harambees come from? Was this extravagance part of their freedom struggle, or is it a newfound entitlement?

These questions underline growing skepticism and discontent among the populace towards the use and allocation of public resources. Transparency and accountability remain elusive, further straining public trust.

Arrogance or Incompetence?

Adding to the public’s frustration is the perceived arrogance of the current leadership. When government officials are questioned by the public, their responses have often been dismissive or even insulting. For example, when the government spokesman was asked about the amount of money used for the President’s trip to the U.S., he hurled insults at the press. Similarly, when confronted about the finance bill’s potential to drive manufacturers out of Kenya, one official nonchalantly responded that they could leave and export their products to Kenya duty-free. Such attitudes from leaders are exacerbating the public’s discontent and fueling the protests, as many feel that their legitimate concerns are being met with arrogance and disrespect. As Isaac Asimov said, “Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent,” prompting reflection on whether such responses are indicative of arrogance, incompetence, or both in governance.

Who Is Drafting This Finance Act?

Another pressing question amidst Kenya’s current turmoil is: who is drafting this finance act? Many clauses within the bill are baffling to those involved in its drafting, leaving them unable to explain their implications. Speculations abound whether the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or the World Bank is influencing the legislation, given their involvement in Kenya’s economic policies. This lack of clarity and understanding among the public and even those drafting the bill raises concerns about transparency and accountability in governance. As protests swell and dissatisfaction grows, the demand for clarity on the origins and implications of these legislative measures becomes ever more urgent.

Does Becoming a Politician Make You More Knowledgeable?

The actions and decisions of Kenya’s political leaders pose a crucial question: Does becoming a politician make you more knowledgeable than other people? The disregard for knowledgeable individuals in the policy-making process suggests that expertise is not being sufficiently valued. Effective governance requires leaders to listen to experts, engage with the public, and make informed decisions. When politicians prioritize party loyalty or personal gain over the input of knowledgeable professionals, it undermines the quality of governance and erodes public trust. The current situation in Kenya highlights the need for leaders who are not only informed but also humble and responsive to the needs of their constituents.

Kenyans are not against taxation; what they want is to know how their money is being used. Leaders should understand that they are not the bosses of Kenyans but their servants. Kenyans are against the wastage they see from their politicians. They don’t want the country to fail; they want it to prosper. Moving to the streets is a sign that politicians have failed to understand their language. Kenyans are peaceful and desire transparency, accountability, and responsible governance to ensure their nation’s growth and success.

The Global Debt Game: A Perpetual Cycle of Lending and Bailouts

Commercial banks from industrialized nations create money out of nothing and lend it to less developed countries (LDCs). They are aware of the risks involved, so they charge high interest rates to compensate. When these LDCs are unable to pay the interest, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) step in to bail them out. This bailout money is also created by the central banks of industrialized nations out of nothing and is given to these LDCs, enabling them to pay their interest and address political needs.

With the risk of default now minimized, commercial banks agree to reduce their interest rates to levels that the debtor governments can manage. This cyclical process keeps the game going indefinitely, effectively transforming the IMF and the World Bank into a global central bank issuing international fiat money.

Once this global central bank is in place, the IMF can collect unlimited resources from the citizens of the world through a hidden tax called inflation. This continuous money stream can be sustained indefinitely, as no country has its own independent money.

The essence of socialism is the redistribution of wealth, aiming for equality by taking from the rich and giving to the poor. Unfortunately, the poor do not benefit significantly from this maneuver. They often do not receive the money initially, as much of it is siphoned off by the bureaucracies administering these programs. The funds are merely spent until they are gone, leaving no one significantly better off.

Politicians understand that promises to redistribute wealth are popular among voters, who believe it will help the poor, and among socialist managers, who see it as job security. This ensures their election and the continuation of the cycle.

In essence, the global financial system operates on a delicate balance of debt, bailouts, and inflation. While the promise of socialism seeks to uplift the poor, the reality often results in the perpetuation of poverty and wealth depletion, maintaining the status quo for those in power.

Trade Deficits and the Role of the IMF in Politicizing Economic Development.

 Trade deficit exists when a country imports a greater value of goods than it exports, meaning it spends more than it earns. This process is unsustainable unless: individuals decrease spending or increase income, which can be achieved by allowing private industry to flourish. However, few politicians respect the dynamics and power of the free enterprise system. Their world is built upon political programs where the role of the free market is manipulated to achieve politically popular goals. While they may desire increased productivity, their political agenda often prevents this from happening.

Another way to address a trade deficit is by obtaining extra money from savings, but governments typically have no savings. Their debts and liabilities exceed their assets by large margins, similar to their citizens and industries. Government savings have already been consumed. Selling assets is another option, but the only tangible assets are gold, of which few countries have significant stock.

The counterfeiting option can only happen if the country’s currency has greater value in international trade, such as the US dollar. The US can finance its trade deficit through fiat money, allowing it to spend more than it earns. The problem arises when the currency’s value declines, leading to inflation because the trade was financed using fiat money.

Borrowing is often presented as a solution to overcoming trade deficits. However, these loans usually do not go to private enterprises where they could potentially turn a profit. Instead, they go to state-owned and operated industries, which are often stifled by bureaucracy and corruption. The World Bank and the IMF provide these loans. Funding for these loans comes from member states in the form of a small amount of cash plus promises to deliver much more if the banks encounter trouble. Based on this small amount of seed money and the greater amount of credits and promises from industrialized countries’ governments, the World Bank can approach commercial loan markets and borrow large sums at extremely low-interest rates. It then relends these funds to underdeveloped countries at a slightly higher rate.

While the aim is to help underdeveloped countries, the reality is different. There are sectoral loans and structural adjustment loans. In the first category, only part of the money is used for the cost of developing projects; other funds are directed towards policy changes, often building socialism, though this term is not used. For example, the Kenyan government’s housing levy requires all employed people to pay, regardless of home ownership. Loans are issued for government projects like dams, hydroelectric power, and roads. The funds pass from politicians to bureaucrats and back to politicians, leading to government expansion. One condition is that the state must be omnipotent, making major decisions without regard for citizens’ welfare.

Economic life in less developed countries is already politicized. One important feature of structural adjustment loans is that the money need not be applied to any specific development project; it can be spent on anything the recipient wants. Austerity measures are mere rhetoric, as borrowing nations often ignore these conditions with impunity, yet the World Bank keeps the money coming anyway.

The hidden agenda of the World Bank and IMF in funding third-world countries often perpetuates corruption and despotism. The loans fund government projects that are inefficiently managed and fail to spur genuine development. As a result, the economies of third-world countries remain politicized and heavily dependent on further loans, creating a cycle of dependency rather than fostering true economic independence and growth.

Youth-Led Protests in Kenya: Genuine Revolution or Political Theater?

In 2023, the Kenyan government’s introduction of additional taxes, including a controversial housing levy initially set at 3% but later reduced to 1.5%, sparked widespread discontent among the populace. Many Kenyans perceived these measures as oppressive, arguing that they should have been voluntary. By 2024, frustrations reached a boiling point with the proposal of new taxes, such as a 16% VAT on bread and additional taxes on motor vehicles and vegetable oil. These fiscal policies, coupled with the perceived misuse of funds by government officials and their lavish lifestyles, intensified public anger. Kenyans began to doubt the necessity of these taxes, suspecting that they were primarily to repay debts to the IMF and World Bank, raising concerns about national sovereignty and the influence of international bodies on domestic financial policies.

President William Ruto’s foreign alliances, including siding with the U.S. against Russia, controversial deployments to Haiti, and unwavering support for Israel in regional conflicts, further deepened public disillusionment. Social media-driven protests (#OccupyParliament, #RejectFinanceBill) and SMS campaigns urging MPs to oppose punitive bills reflected widespread discontent, despite police efforts to suppress demonstrations. These events, unfolding in 2024, prompt a crucial question: Are the ongoing protests in Kenya the onset of a genuine revolution, or merely a spectacle of political theater?

Examining major revolutions from history can provide insight into whether Kenya’s current situation might lead to significant political transformation or fade as a momentary upheaval. The French Revolution began due to severe social inequality, exacerbated by a financial crisis stemming from costly wars and poor governance. Enlightenment ideas challenging absolute monarchy and aristocratic privilege fueled demands for reform. The weak leadership of King Louis XVI and the exclusion of the Third Estate from political representation further fueled discontent. The convocation of the Estates-General and subsequent formation of the National Assembly marked the revolution’s onset, with events like the storming of the Bastille symbolizing the people’s desire to dismantle the old regime and establish a new order based on equality and popular sovereignty.

The American Revolution was driven by grievances against British rule, including taxation without representation and the desire for greater autonomy. Tensions escalated with events like the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party, leading to armed conflict at Lexington and Concord and a formal declaration of independence in 1776. The revolution culminated in the Treaty of Paris in 1783, formally recognizing the United States as an independent nation and establishing a democratic foundation that influenced constitutional governance worldwide.

The Arab Spring was a series of pro-democracy uprisings and protests that swept through several Arab countries. Sparked by social, economic, and political grievances, including authoritarian rule, corruption, high unemployment, and lack of political freedoms, the protests were largely driven by young people using social media to mobilize. The movement led to the overthrow of long-standing dictators in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen, while sparking significant unrest and reforms in other countries. Despite initial hopes for democratic transitions, the outcomes varied, with some countries experiencing civil war, increased instability, or a return to authoritarianism.

In modern times, social media has revolutionized the dynamics of protest and revolution. Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram enable rapid communication and coordination among activists, transcending geographical boundaries and censorship barriers. They facilitate the rapid spread of messages, images, and videos that galvanize public opinion, expose government repression, and mobilize mass participation in protests. Social media also amplifies voices traditionally marginalized by mainstream media, providing a platform for grassroots movements and enabling real-time updates that shape global perceptions and solidarity. However, it also poses challenges, such as misinformation and government surveillance, highlighting both its empowering and contentious role in modern revolutionary movements.

Despite minor concessions such as the removal of taxes on bread and vegetable oil, public trust in the Kenyan government has sharply declined. Kenyans view these gestures as insufficient and insincere, intensifying their calls for greater accountability and transparency. As protests persist and demands for change grow louder, the true nature of these events—whether they signify a genuine revolution or a spectacle of political theater—remains to be fully understood. The coming days will reveal whether Kenya stands on the brink of transformative reform or continues to navigate a precarious path of discontent and incremental adjustments.

THE BRETTON WOODS CONFRENCE

In July 1944, a significant conference took place at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. This gathering, known as the Bretton Woods Conference, brought together 730 delegates from 44 Allied nations. The participants included financiers, economists, and politicians. Initially called the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, it is now known as the Bretton Woods Conference.

During that meeting, two international agencies were created:

• The International Monetary Fund (IMF)
• The World Bank

The World Bank was intended to make loans to war-torn and underdeveloped nations so they could build stronger economies. The IMF was supposed to promote monetary cooperation between nations by maintaining fixed exchange rates between their currencies. This was achieved by terminating the use of gold as the basis of international currency exchange and replacing it with politically manipulated paper standards. In other words, it allowed governments to escape the discipline of gold so they could create money out of nothing without paying the penalty of having the currency drop in value on world markets.

Before this conference, currencies were exchanged in terms of their gold value, an arrangement known as the gold exchange standard. Under this system, currency could be exchanged for gold. The exchange value of various currencies, most of which were not backed by gold, was determined by what they could buy in the open market. Their value, therefore, was set by supply and demand. Politicians and bankers despised this arrangement because it was beyond their ability to manipulate.

ON THE VERGE OF A NEW WORLD ORDER

ON THE VERGE OF A NEW WORLD ORDER

The grand sweep of history, empires have exhibited a rhythm, a predictable rise and fall guided by recurring patterns. This cyclical narrative unfolds as nations ascend to economic and military prominence, establishing global hegemony and imprinting their currency as the benchmark for international trade. Yet, as internal and external challenges mount, the empire embarks on a natural cycle of decline.

This exploration of historical trajectories seeks to unveil the underlying patterns of economic and social change that mark imperial downfalls. One of the contributing factors is the widening chasm of economic and social inequality. As disparities grow, the social fabric weakens, breeding internal discord that undermines the empire’s foundations. Excessive debt, both public and private, coupled with unsuitable monetary policies, emerges as another harbinger of imperial decline, fostering financial crises and economic decay.

Throughout history, major powers have often wielded a reserve currency. However, as their global influence wanes, often due to a loss of confidence in their economic policies, this reserve currency loses its sheen.

In the current global landscape, a looming threat hangs over the once-dominant dollar, teetering on the edge due to the substantial fiscal deficit in the United States. The sustainability of massive indebtedness rests on the world’s continued confidence in the U.S.’s ability to meet its obligations. Should this confidence erode, investors and nations may seek alternative currencies to diversify their reserves.

Amidst skepticism about the U.S.’s fiscal stewardship, emerging powers are actively seeking to extricate themselves from the dollar’s grasp. The process of de-dollarization unfolds, a deliberate move to disentangle economies from the U.S.-dominated international monetary system. The BRICS group, led by China, takes strides toward establishing its own currency, potentially supported by tangible assets like gold—a reflection of historical patterns of imperial decline.

However, within this complex dance of economic recalibration, a note of caution reverberates. The transition from economic shifts to potential armed conflicts is a path trodden before. The escalating tensions between major powers, as witnessed in current U.S.-China relations, hint at a familiar script—one that historically has unfolded into economic sanctions and even military engagements. The echoes of a new world order emerge, a script where dominant powers rarely yield without a struggle.

Unraveling the Knot: Navigating the Complexity of the Israel-Palestine Conflict.

In the aftermath of World War I, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire left Britain in control of Palestine, a land predominantly inhabited by Arabs with a Jewish minority. Entrusted by the international community to establish a Jewish homeland, tensions escalated between the two groups. The 1920s and 1940s witnessed a significant influx of Jewish immigrants to Palestine, driven by persecution in Europe and the aftermath of the Holocaust. This surge heightened friction between Jews and Arabs, coupled with resistance against British rule.

The situation reached a critical juncture in 1947 when the United Nations proposed the partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with international administration over Jerusalem. While the Jewish leadership embraced the plan, the Arab side rejected it vehemently, preventing its implementation. In 1948, amid unabated strife, British authorities withdrew, and Jewish leaders declared the establishment of Israel. This move was met with opposition from many Palestinians, sparking a war. Neighboring Arab nations intervened militarily, resulting in hundreds of thousands of Palestinians either fleeing or being displaced—an event referred to as Al Nakba or “The Catastrophe.”

Since then, Israel and Palestine have experienced numerous conflicts, ranging from minor skirmishes to catastrophic events causing thousands of casualties. In 1987, Hamas emerged as a significant player—a political and military entity initiated by Palestinian cleric Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The two Palestinian uprisings, known as ‘intifadas,’ significantly impacted Israeli-Palestinian relations, particularly the second, which disrupted the 1990s peace process and ushered in a new era of conflict, involving Hamas. The Camp David Summit in 2000, convened by US President Bill Clinton, failed to yield a resolution between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, further straining relations.

Hamas, with its military capabilities, has consistently called for fighters in the West Bank and the broader Arab and Islamic world to join the struggle against Israel. Presently, tensions persist in East Jerusalem, Gaza, and the West Bank. Israel and Egypt maintain strict control over Gaza’s borders to curb Hamas’s access to weapons, leading to a humanitarian crisis with limited access to essentials for Gazans.

The Palestinian narrative emphasizes suffering due to Israeli actions, such as the blockade of Gaza, the construction of the West Bank barrier, and the demolition of Palestinian homes. In contrast, Israel contends that its actions are in self-defense, citing repeated rocket attacks from Hamas and numerous assaults on Israeli civilians by Palestinian militants. The entrenched positions on both sides contribute to the ongoing complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A Global Saga of Inflation Challenges

Navigating Economic Turmoil Across Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Sudan, and Beyond

In recent years, several nations across the globe have grappled with soaring inflation rates, creating profound economic challenges and, in some cases, crises that significantly impact the lives of their citizens. Among these nations, Zimbabwe stands out with a staggering hyperinflation rate of 284.94%, ushering in severe financial burdens for its populace. Similarly, Venezuela, Sudan, Turkey, Argentina, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Yemen, Iran, and Ethiopia are confronting their own unique economic struggles, marked by inflation rates that demand immediate attention and comprehensive solutions. This exploration delves into the intricacies of each nation’s economic predicament, shedding light on the multifaceted factors contributing to their respective inflationary challenges and emphasizing the critical need for remedial actions to restore stability and improve the well-being of their populations

Zimbabwe is currently grappling with an alarming hyperinflation rate of 284.94%, placing severe financial burdens on its citizens. Situated in southern Africa, the nation is confronting a multitude of challenges contributing to this crisis, resulting in shortages of basic necessities such as food and money.

Venezuela, located in northern South America, is experiencing a staggering inflation rate of 210%. The economic turmoil in the country is attributed to a complex interplay of factors, including political instability and mismanagement of resources. This hyperinflation has led to widespread poverty and economic upheaval.

In northeastern Africa, Sudan is contending with a concerning inflation rate of 154.91%. The economic challenges faced by Sudan are driven by a combination of factors, including political instability and disruptions to the nation’s economy

Turkey, situated at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, is grappling with an inflation rate of 73.13%. The country’s economic challenges are influenced by various factors, including currency fluctuations and external pressures.

Argentina, located in South America, is experiencing an inflation rate of 72.37%. This economic issue is driven by a mix of factors, including financial policies and currency devaluation.

Sri Lanka, an island nation in South Asia, faces an inflation rate of 48.19%. The economic challenges in Sri Lanka are influenced by various factors, including external debts and import-related pressures.

In northern South America, Suriname is confronting an inflation rate of 47.56%. The country’s economic issues are exacerbated by factors such as currency devaluation and financial challenges.

Yemen, situated in the Middle East, is experiencing an inflation rate of 43.85%. The country’s economic troubles are intensified by the ongoing conflict and political instability.

Iran, located in southwestern Asia, has an inflation rate of 39.99%. The economic challenges in Iran are influenced by various factors, including global sanctions and financial policies

Ethiopia, located in the Horn of Africa, faces an inflation rate of 33.64%. The country’s economic challenges are driven by various factors, including political instability and external pressures.

 The global surge in inflation rates poses a dire threat to nations like Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Sudan, Turkey, Argentina, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Yemen, Iran, and Ethiopia. Each faces unique economic challenges, demanding swift and comprehensive solutions. The international community must prioritize collaborative efforts to address these crises, as the impact extends beyond economic realms, profoundly affecting the lives of citizens. Urgent actions are imperative to restore stability and improve the well-being of these nations’ populations.

AFRICAN DEBT: A DILLEMA.

In the intricate global economic tapestry, numerous African nations grapple with a challenging symphony— a credit crunch interwoven with historical legacies, economic vulnerabilities, and the seismic disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic. This financial quandary, echoing the shadows of colonialism and post-independence instability, has deep historical roots. From inherited debts to economic dependence on limited industries, these nations face multifaceted hurdles. As we navigate this complex landscape, the following exploration dissects the historical factors, economic challenges, and global conditions shaping the intricate narrative of a credit crunch in Africa.

HISTORICAL FACTORS

The colonial legacy left these nations grappling with inherited debts incurred for the development of infrastructure and resources primarily serving colonial interests. Unfavorable loan terms, marked by high interest rates and short repayment periods, posed challenges for newly independent nations. Economic structures established during colonialism led to a dependence on a limited range of industries or commodities, rendering these economies vulnerable to external shocks. Post-independence political instability further disrupted economic planning and debt management. Limited access to favorable terms in international capital markets compelled reliance on less optimal bilateral and multilateral loans.

 ECONOMIC CHALLENGES

Many African nations heavily depend on the export of a few primary commodities, such as oil, minerals, or agricultural products, rendering their economies vulnerable to fluctuations in global commodity prices. This dependence, coupled with limited economic diversification, leaves these nations ill-prepared to weather shocks, leading to a reliance on external financing, often in the form of loans. Changes in global economic conditions, including shifts in interest rates, further compound the issue by increasing the cost of servicing debt. Insufficient infrastructure, funded through borrowing, can become a burden if the expected returns are not realized promptly. Persistent trade imbalances and currency depreciation add to the challenge, necessitating external financing to cover deficits.

GLOBAL ECONOMICAL CONDITIONS

Changes in interest rates impact the cost of borrowing, straining budgets when rates rise. Vulnerability to external shocks, like fluctuations in commodity prices, leads to declines in export earnings and increased reliance on external borrowing. Currency exchange rate fluctuations, especially for foreign-denominated debts, can escalate repayment costs. Conditions in global financial markets affect financing availability, with economic uncertainties leading to higher borrowing costs or restricted access. Changes in global trade dynamics can hinder export revenues, creating difficulties in servicing debts. Additionally, during economic downturns, international aid availability may be constrained

CORRUPTION AND POOR GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA

Rampant corruption diverts resources from productive uses, inflates project costs, and leads to the accumulation of debt without commensurate economic development. Inadequate transparency in financial transactions fosters an environment conducive to corrupt practices, making it difficult to ensure borrowed funds are used as intended. Weak fiscal management, marked by ineffective policies and financial mismanagement, contributes to unsustainable debt levels. Political instability and policy uncertainty disrupt long-term planning and deter foreign investment, limiting revenue sources beyond borrowing. The lack of institutional capacity in public administration hampers effective governance, hindering the implementation of policies crucial for sound economic management and debt sustainability. Additionally, poorly designed debt management strategies, including insufficient risk assessment and negotiation of favorable terms, further exacerbate debt-related challenges.

THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC

The unprecedented global health crisis led to severe disruptions in trade, tourism, and commodity prices, causing a sharp decline in export revenues for many African nations. Simultaneously, governments faced increased health-related expenditures and the need for economic stimulus measures. The resulting budgetary strains, coupled with a decline in revenue, compelled several countries to resort to additional borrowing. The pandemic-induced economic downturn also heightened the vulnerability of African currencies, contributing to higher debt-servicing costs for those with foreign-denominated debts.

In the complex symphony of challenges facing African nations—rooted in historical legacies, economic vulnerabilities, and the seismic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic—a nuanced approach is imperative. Fostering economic diversification, transparent governance, and sound debt management are pivotal. The road ahead demands concerted efforts and international collaboration to liberate these economies from the grip of the credit crunch, steering them towards a resilient and sustainable future